But the WWF still considers FSC certification the only credible one (above the purely recycled). Just 0.05m hectares of FSC-certified forest are owned by indigenous communities (compared to 50.5m hectares owned privately). Anecdotal evidence from the paper industry suggests that printers are put off by hefty fees to certify as FSC. The 2010 documentary Sustainable on Paper, by Leo Broers and An-Katrien Lecluyse, exposed a certified plantation in Brazil as a eucalyptus monoculture polluting local communities. This is crucial: forests support 1.6 billion of the poorest people in the world. Violence and the displacement of indigenous peoples are also prohibited in its chain. So far, 174m hectares of forests have met its strict criteria. Meanwhile, the FSC uses a system of inspecting and tracking timber and pulp right through the chain. If the paper was recovered using energy generated from coal, it might as well not be recycled. Check percentages: buy the highest level of "post-consumer waste paper" – aim for 100%. We also "get it" – put the paper in the recycling bin, close the loop by buying recycled, and hey presto: virgin trees have been saved.īut a lack of credible certification means "recycled" paper might not contain a very high a level of old paper. Recycling one tonne of paper would power a home for nine months, save 7,000 gallons of water and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by one metric tonne of carbon equivalent ( CO 2e). You are trying to choose between two different systems of producing less wasteful paper.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |